Rants, Raves and Resources



 
 
 
 
 

Disclaimer:
The opinions expressed by the individual writers on
Rants, Raves, and Resources do not necessarily represent those of the Site Owner. This page is dedicated to the free expression of personal experience within the parameters of my Mission Statement. This page is to be taken as the opinions of others, many of them based on each ones personal experience. It is not recommended by me to be taken as advice, or direction, on whch anyone should act without questioning the content. If you make the choice to act on the opinions of others, please proceed with the utmost of caution and be prepared to accept responsibility for your own actions.
I repeat again; I am NOT a medical professional or mental health expert. I am an ex mental patient and psychiatric survivour, one who believes also from experience that 'bio-psych' is the wrong way to go.


 


You See, the Mental Illness System KNOWS What it Causes Even While it is Causing it. They just see it as a 'lesser' of 'Two Evils.'

 

PSEUDOPATIENTS AND THEIR SETTINGS

(From On Being Sane in Insane Places by David Rosenhan, M.D.)


The eight pseudo patients were a varied group. One was a psychology graduate student in his 20’s. The remaining seven were older and “established.” Among them were three psychologists, a pediatrician, a psychiatrist, a painter, and a housewife. Three pseudo patients were women, five were men. All of them employed pseudonyms, lest their alleged diagnoses embarrass them later.

Restated by Me:  When you real name is connected to a psychiatric label, it is going to be 'embarrassing' at the very least. You and I know of course that it is going to be a whole lot MORE than  just 'embarrassing. it is going to change your life forever.

 
• Posting Opinions in the First Person Singular
To save any of these files on your computer, right-click and choose "Save target as" from the menu that pops up

An Experienced First Person Perspective

By, and For, the Psychiatrized

 

This page is, as it suggests, is for the participation of the Dissatisfied Psychiatric Survivor and is for the purposes of venting, offering alternatives/ideas that seemed to work for the individual writer who is contributing,  and any resources on line or otherwise, that he or she found helpful.

Individuals may contribute their own work to this page no more than two or three times a year, so if you have a lot to say, make it a long post. The reason for this limitation is that I do not want to end up editing an online newspaper while ignoring my own work on the website for which I created it in the first place.

To post here, you are required to register your e-mail to my site. You do not need to accept a newsletter or involve yourself in the CounterPsych Forum when you do, although you can if you want to do so, and you can also refuse delivery of any mail when you register. I require this for identification purposes only as it tends to keep the harassers away if they think they are known.

 

All writing must be submitted to me in it's final form, along with your name and e-mail address. I will not accept it for posting here unless the following conditions are met:

 

1. No foul language, cursing etc.

2, Do not name specifically your psychiatrist(s) or the institutions in which you were incarcerated. I am taking care of my, and your, liability problems by keeping the names out.

3. Do not suggest any form of violence against self or others, including threats of suicide and/or murder.
 

I reserve the right to refuse to post any submission, without reasons given, other than that this is my website and I will keep it directed in the way I want it to go.

 

If the above conditions are met, I will do nothing more than run a spell check through it, so be sure it is in the form you want it to be in before you send it.  You may request to have your own essay/post accepted and/or removed at any time by notifying me at:

Patricia-CounterpsychSPAMAWAY@live.ca

 

 Patricia@SPAMAWAYCounterPsych.com

 

(In both cases remove the word SPAMAWAY and close the space.)

 

This is a PUBLIC Page so please keep that in mind at all times and be aware that you can use this space to help, or to harm, yourself and all other psychiatrized persons, depending upon what you say, and HOW you say it, so speak from the wisdom of your own personal experience as best you can and help to change the world for the better.

 

Disclaimer:

 

The opinions, experiences and feelings expressed by the writers contributing to this page of my Website, are his or her own, and do not necessarily reflect my own experience, opinions or feelings. Though I am very often in agreement with many of the ideas of other psychiatrized persons, that is not always the case just as it is not always the case with 'experts' or the yet to BE psychiatrized, who just may sometimes now be working as professionals in the mental illness system.

(Just as has been said about me from four feet away, "you never know "...)

 

That stated, this page is for the purpose defined by its own name.




Reyel Jensen Jardine-Douglas 09/05/2010


By Graeme Bacque

Tragedy struck yet again in Toronto on the afternoon of August 29th when 25-year old Pickering , Ontario resident Reyal Jensen Jardine-Douglas was gunned down by Toronto Police as he attempted to flee from a TTC bus.
 

Initially it was reported that police had been summoned in response to an ‘altercation’ on a bus, and that Jardine-Douglas had been fatally shot following a ‘confrontation’ with police. 

Later on, it was revealed that no such altercation took place. Apparently Jardine-Douglas’s parents, whom had made repeated attempts to have their son involuntarily committed during the previous several days, were the ones to call the cops when he attempted to evade their efforts by hopping on the bus.  

It appears that he panicked and attempted to flee when the cops stopped and boarded the bus – and the rest is now tragic history.

 The police are claiming a knife was recovered from the scene of the shooting, but never clearly connected it to the victim. 

This is the third fatal shooting involving the Toronto Police Service in the past eight months. In all three cases the cops have attempted to justify their trigger-happy responses by playing the ‘mental illness’ card. 

This practice of involving law enforcement in emotional crises where no crime has been committed has to stop. Lives are being put on the line every time the Thought Police are summoned in response to someone’s visible distress. 

The 'solution' being flouted in my jurisdiction and elsewhere is 'community crisis teams' which pair a cop with a psych. nurse on patrol.

This started as a pilot project in my precinct about ten years ago and after quietly receiving permanent funding there are now a dozen of these teams deployed in the City of Toronto .

There are even some psych. survivors I know who feel this half-assed 'remedy' is the greatest thing since sliced bread. I really have to question the thinking here.

However you try to pretty things up, at the end of the day it still amounts to a confrontation with a uniformed, armed police officer, and even where the victim physically survives the encounter the typical end result is still them being dragged off in shackles.  
 

As well, this approach gives disturbing new powers to psychiatric personnel. Acting on their own, a psychiatric nurse (or other professional) has no more right to cross another person's threshold uninvited than does any other citizen.

By virtue of being paired with a police officer, all they have to do now is to express the belief that a 'medical emergency' exists within the home in question - which then gives the cop legal authority to force entry, and voila! Instant psychiatric home invasion, all nice and legal.

The victims in these cases will never be criminally charged, speak to a lawyer or get to have the circumstances of their detention reviewed by a judge or JP - but they still lose their freedom, and for most who enter he system this way, that's only the start of the fun. (Note the bitter irony).

I had my own run-in with this particular Mental Health Gestapo unit in April of 2009 when a misinterpreted Facebook status update resulted in my apartment being overrun with cops.  

Two fortuitous circumstances saved my ass that spring evening. I had stepped out and wasn’t home when the cops arrived (eight or nine of them, according to the account a neighbor gave me later that night), along with the fact that several of my friends also responded and covered my back until I was able to disengage with the police.  

I was lucky – a brief meeting with one cop in a public place (on the street corner outside my apartment building, in daylight) with my friends bearing witness was sufficient to bring the situation to a peaceful conclusion. 

Far too many others are much less fortunate. Had my skin been a different color, or I hadn’t had the backing of my friends...

You'd think by now that people would realize this approach is akin to playing with old dynamite and literally puts lives at stake every time it happens. 
 

But most folks are still too conned by the official 'mental health professional' mantra of aggressive intervention being the only way to go, or too freaked-out at the sight of someone else's emotional distress to stop and consider other possible options. 

What we need is neighborhood-based, non-medical, hassle-free crisis centres, staffed by psychiatric survivors, where distressed people can go at any hour of the day or night to receive sympathetic counseling, or have a meal or to get a few hours’ uninterrupted sleep in a safe environment.  

We need ‘community crisis teams’ of our own, not involving either the police or psych. professionals, that are trained to intervene nonviolently and de-escalate crises by offering reassurance to the frightened, lonely, confused souls who could otherwise become the victims of an inappropriate police response. 

We also need on-call telephone peer-based trauma counseling available at any time of the day or night for people who simply want to talk.  

This latter resource was provided to protesters by trained volunteers during the recent   G-20 summit in Toronto – these anti-globalization kids are really on the ball with this kind of stuff!  We can learn a lot from the example being set by these young people – we’ve got some potentially valuable allies there.  

And while the idea may make some people uncomfortable, spiritual support tailored to the individual’s personal belief system would be a useful resource if someone wants it.  My own feeling is that a large percentage of the issues being pathologized by psychiatry (and responded to violently by law enforcement and ‘mental health professionals’) are in fact spiritual in nature.  

Most of the remainder can be attributed to trauma, in which case responding with force is the worst mistake that can be made. It makes no sense to intervene aggressively with an individual who is already frightened or in emotional pain. This is just begging for a situation like what resulted in last Sunday’s tragedy. At the very least it will only exacerbate the person’s distress. 

Until people lose their irrational fear of others’ emotional distress; until people realize that calling in the cops to deal with such crises is a recipe for disaster, and until people realize that relying on psychiatry’s promised ‘quick fix’ approach to dealing with distressed (or merely bothersome) human beings is not the way to go, then tragedies such as befell Mr. Jardine-Douglas will only be repeated.

 

Graeme Bacque

August 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 
< Older Entry Newer Entry >
 
Post a Comment  |  Register For Email Updates

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

• Mel O'Dea, Psychiatric Survivour, Ireland
To save any of these files on your computer, right-click and choose "Save target as" from the menu that pops up

THE  CHURCH  OF

SCHIZOPHRENIA

ORGANIZATION  GUIDE

INTRODUCTION

When  people  go to a church and start talking in tongues, they don't have any idea what they are saying and neither does anyone else.  However, such behavior and other bizarre acts as talking to and seeing Angels that no one else can see or hear is both acceptable and desirable within a religious setting.

Should someone have similar experiences outside of a religious setting, however, they could easily be called schizophrenic and locked away indefinitely.

The key difference is in the write up or the nomenclature used to describe the experience.  While humans have had access to alternative states of consciousness for countless thousands of years, it is only in relatively recent times that scientists have sought to limit the ability of humans to experience other states of awareness by specifying what they feel is normal and what is not and by setting up an enforcement system backed by the force of law to hunt down people whose state of consciousness they disagree with and lock them away.

Click Title for more...





Although some of the CCHR/Scientology videos against psychiatry and its practices ring true in parts, I think this organization has some problems of its own so I present the opposing viewpoint here as well. 

Refund and Reparation


Lecture: Handling Psychotics


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
00013021
 

A Little Help from Our David Suzuki


                                                                                   Enter here



 
 
 
© 2012 CounterPsych Log In