...And a Few Other Thoughts, Hopefully not too 'Disordered' for You...By Patricia Lefave, Monophrenic
It is my contention that psychiatrists don't give those they label the ''schizophrenics" enough credit for understanding and awareness and conversely, that those labelled
the schizophrenics are giving psychiatrists, and many others as well, far too MUCH
credit for understanding and awareness. This mutual delusion creates a whole lot of chaos and confusion all round.
Has it not occurred to you that many of the 'genetic defectives' picked up and labelled in this, in Nazi Germany, by psychiatrists
were labelled because
they had spoken up and warned others of the fascist agenda they had seen, which those 'others' did NOT
I personally think psychiatry should look for the malformed gene that causes psychiatrists to actually believe
that they can understand other people's entire lives and experiences by listening to people they have just met, for ten to fifteen minutes. They do this by listening for the abstract ideas behind
the concrete details of what people say. So while we sit there speaking of things in concrete terms, believing we are being heard
, the psychiatrists' (when they are thinking like psychiatrists according to Gordon Warme, M.D.,) have their eyes rolled up in their heads looking for the conceptual match in their own programming. I mean really...how bizarre an idea is that?
This is a self serving business and there is no other like it. The mental illness business is the ONLY
business for which consumer complaints about the product cause an INCREASE
in the ability of the business to force
the product on the consumer who does not want
it.Message off the TVExploiting an 'asset' is easier when they have an addiction you can feed.Michael, ex 'spy"
on Burn NoticeOn Group think
You see, the group covering up for
the abuser is really motivated by covering up their own "
participation" in the abuse. It also conceals the fact that otherwise 'normal,' average people can so easily be manipulated by one person who convinces them they represent the 'superior' human
beings. This is how they are moved into the psychological position to join
in the abuse of the victim(s). They are also trying to conceal the fact that they ENJOY
Soon, I am going to just spell
out, in a list for you, the concepts of the est-ee nurse's so called training, so that you can see how to connect
your group behaviour, "out here in the world of reality" to the conceptual pattern that lies behind it and with which you have all been manipulated by the ones with the "hidden" agenda of domination. You see from MY
point of view, it was the opposite
. I had to find the means to make sense of my CONCRETE
experience of all of you, and all the chaos and confusion you
created, which you had partly 'concealed', by finding the missing
information that would allow me to sort it out. That missing information was the conceptual pattern or "play" which is laid out in the est training which I found in a book in 99 and more of it online after 2001. I already understood most
of it because I have seen this group behaviour before, though it was not called 'est' in other cases. The contents
of the training is kept 'secret' by those who use it for Power."Do not share the contents of the training with non estians as it will only confuse them."
That is a nexus statement which is both positive and negative AT THE SAME TIME.
It means nothing
because it can mean anything
It suggests that explaining it to others would confuse them, and those motivated by a desire to keep others from being
confused will keep it secret for that
misguided reason. OR
it suggests to sociopaths, who are after
power and control of 'items' (which COULD
mean people reduced to the level of OBJECTS)
that if they keep the contents (concepts) of the training secret
, and just share the experience (concretize it) of it, it will confuse their "item." If confusion was the goal, (which in est is set FIRST
) then the sociopath in this training just might hear that as an instruction to gain power and control might he not? It only gains any meaning
as a concept when it is used
in some way in connection to the details of concrete reality. (The devil is in the DETAILS
Let me be sure to add the ever popular "bona fide' to that...
Not unlike those old "Aryans" huh?
An example of the "meaninglessness' of est