Questioning Normality

Sarah Chapter 27

From Motherhood the Second Oldest Profession

By Humorist author the late Erma Bombeck
with Commentary by me

I am reproducing part of this book here for educational purposes. I don't think that Erma would mind. Intended to be funny or not, it is pretty on target as far as how " reality"' gets distorted by the "inputs" of large groups of people operating with their own hidden agendas and demonstrates how people get TOLDwho they are and how they are going to feel about it, and are often not ASKED or heard. This has now become so common it is not even seen anymore so maybe if we just SHOW you, it might cause some of you to wake up to an awareness of the some of the messes humanity creates for itself ( and "others") while looking to "broken brains" as the cause, rather than the failure to use the brains we were born with just to see, and hear, the reality of ourselves. It is always about boundaries.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted ( ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit.


By Erma B.

There are three things in this world that people refuse to accept: an incurable bad back, directions without a map, and a woman who does not want a child.

Sarah did not want a child. She was thirty two, happy with her marriage, happy with her job, and happy with her life. What she was unhappy about was the people around her who seemed to feel that her choice not to have children was their business.

People like her mother, her sister Gracie, (mother of five), her best friend Dodie, and her gynaecologist, who reminded her, "You're not getting any younger." (who is?)

One day, in a moment of intimacy when she and her mother were alone, Sarah attempted one last time to explain to her mother why she preferred to remain childless.

"Try to understand Mom," she said. "I'm not against children. I'm just against them for me. For Gracie, it's fine. She is a born mother. I just don't want to go through life with little gates all over the house and a bathtub full of ducks and boats. People who have children change and it's scary. They lose a part of themselves that I don't want to lose. It's like someone flipping a switch. All of a sudden you're not a person anymore. You're attached to another human being. Separate them and they both die.

I don't want to be an extension of someone else's fever, someone else's hunger, someone else's pain, disappointment and frustration. I had a wonderful childhood but when I was a child, I never began to appreciate all your work and sacrifice. What did you get out of it? A lot of slammed doors and a wooden pig that held recipes for your birthday.

If I had children Mom I'd be having them for all of the wrong reasons-because you wanted to be a grandmother or Steve wanted someone to carry on his name or I couldn't stand the pressure of people wanting to know why I don't have children.

I don't think I'm selfish. I'm certainly not bitter or angry. I just feel I have a choice and I have every right to make it. Do you understand?

Her mother nodded.

The next morning in a planned moment of intimacy, Sarah's mother called her other daughter Gracie, and said, "I think I know why your sister doesn't want a child."

Gracie glued the receiver to her ear, "Why?"

"Well," said her mother, I don't pretend to understand all of what she said, so I'll quote verbatim. She's scared! It' s that simple. The idea of having a baby scares her spitless, and besides, she doesn't want all the mess around the house, like rubber boats and gates."

"She made it pretty clear that if I want to be a grandmother again it's in your all park since you love the crud detail. Besides , she said with her luck she'd catch a fever from them and probably eat every time they ate and weigh a ton. Does that make sense to you?"

"Perfectly," Gracie said.

Within the hour Gracie called Dodie, Sarah's best friend and said, Hold onto your hat. Remember how none of us could figure out why Sarah shouldn't have a child and be as miserable as the rest of us. Well Mom talked with her this morning and she finally confessed."

"What's her problem?", asked Dodie.

"I couldn't believe it when Mom told me. Sarah is afraid of losing her shape! She never weighed over 115 pounds in her entire life."

"I think I've heard about that", said Dodie. It's called sagophobia. It's the fear of the entire body falling down around your knees."'

"And listen to this," interrupted Gracie, "she said if anyone in the family should have a packful of kids, it's me. How do you like that? She said I've always got a houseful of old gates and soldiers and boats all over the place but I'm used to it. She didn't say it in so many words but Mom guessed the real reason is that Sarah is up for promotion and she can't afford to pass it up. I'm not too shocked are you?"

"Not really," said Dodie.

When her husband came home, Dodie handed him a drink and said, "you'll never guess what Sarah's sister told me today."

"Surprise me," said Bob opening up the paper and burying himself behind it.

"She said Sarah wants a baby but they can't afford one. And all this time she's been putting up such a brave front and all, pretending she didn't want one. Gracie said she's up for promotion if she can keep her weight under 115. I don't know what they're going to do if she doesn't get it. Obviously Steve's job is on shaky ground. They won't even be able to adopt.I wonder why they bought a boat. Are you listening to me?

"I heard every word," said Bob.

Several days later while playing handball with Sarah's father, Bob said, "Congratulations. I hear Steve and Sarah are adopting a Korean child and going boating this summer if he can turn his career around."

That night, Sarah's father said to her mother , "Have you talked to Sarah lately?"

"Not in the last day or two."

"I heard the strangest rumour at the gym today. Something about Sarah wanting to adopt but Steve doesn't want to. Does that make sense to you?"

"Perfectly," said his wife.

Exactly one week from the time they had their "little talk", Sarah's mother paid her daughter a visit , looked her in the eyes, kissed her on the cheek, and said, "I want you to know that whatever your decision for your future, your father and I will support you a hundred per cent. I know now why you said the things you did and we love you for it."

As Sarah told Steve that night, "Imagine my thinking my mother wouldn't understand a word of what I was saying. Sometimes I think we underrate mothers."

Paranoid Patty Commentary:

This is a good example, albeit 'humorous', of how something with a speck of truth in it becomes an unrecognizable "reality" when it gets passed through a group of people who 'spin' it to make it 'fit' their own beliefs and desires. This is also a good example of the chain reaction of gossip mongers and busy bodies when they are determined to create and define 'reality' for others. It is all the 'hidden' dis-information, (covert ops you might say) information deleted, and information invented and added, that makes 'reality' unrecognizable to the one who is living it from her own point of view. In fact, there is NO real communication going on in those relationships at all.

This is not a description of intimacy. It is a description of neurotic enmeshment. Though they are often passedoff as the same thing, they really aren't the same thing at all. Though we laugh when we see it and hear it, it is not really all that funny because it means that we create situations in which any real intimacy is impossible, because we must either please the one who defines us to be included in their lives,[1] or we must risk, and often accept, being pushed out of their lives for failing to agree with their definitons of us and accept going it alone. It is not a "choice' we need to make.

The choice to make to actually resolve these kinds of conflicts is to focus on the development of personal boundaries while acknowledging that others have the right to do the same and that no one has the right to IMPOSE their will on another. If we were truly equal, and respected the rights of others, we would already know that.

Now what makes situations like this 'different' for those defined as 'mentally ill' for talking about it? The group behaviour is completely denied to existANYWHERE other than in the mind of the one declared to be "defective." Once that has been done, whatever power they had over their own lives is now handed almost completely to others, often against their will, and those 'others' who can never be blamed for anything, create and define their reality for them FOREVER. THAT is when the individual comes to know how very invisible they are as a person to almost everyone. There is no arguing with the deadly combination of "authority" and "group consensus" there?

If you doubt that, look back in time to the Nazi era or the one before that in Armenia, or any of the ones, many of them ongoing right now, after them.We cannot solve problems we don't acknowledge and we will never 'fix' what we are not "allowed" to see.

Stay tuned for a Psy-Fi extension to this humorous episode in relationships from Erma B. as I take it a bit farther for you, to the point of Sarah's ultimate breakdown under group pressure, hospitalization and the great relief almost all of Sarah's family and friends feel when shefinally gets the psychiatric label she really needs which explains (away) Sarah's perception/reaction problem to everyone concerned.

[1] Which means denying the reality of ourselves and being people pleasers.


Please install Flash® and turn on Javascript.

When you open your mind to the impossible, sometimes you find the truth.

Walter, The Mad Scientist On Fringe


For more information and inquiries, contact:
Patricia, Site Owner

How to Use These Public Posting Boards

We can use these public boards as a means of collective contact amongst psychiatric survivour/ex mental patients. 

(Interacting with the non- psychiatrized as well where appropriate) As with all sites like mine, this is a good way to get out of psycho-social isolation, feel connected to those with similar experiences, and to share what helps and what does not.

Please remember that this one is a PUBLIC board so that anyone can see what you have to say. I personally have access to your addresses and e-mails when you register but you do not have to use your real name or otherwise expose your identity. The server owner also has access to anything you post here as well but it will not be used in any way UNLESS you say something that is breaking the laws.

I want to keep my ‘G’ rating so that a ten year old could read this without blushing, feeling frightened or learning new words that would shock even me as an old lady... so watch your way of expressing yourself please. I do not have a lot of time on line so if anyone notices a problem with any posts please bring it to my attention by sending me an e-mail directing me, by title, to the problem post. E-mail me at:

Remove the word SPAMAWAY and close the space.

Please download the two PDF files below regarding how to use the boards and the software.

1.   Posting in the First Person Singular Style

This one is about the simple method of use

2.   Registering, Signing in and Using the Software

This one is about the physical use of the site software and gives a step by step direction.

Both are in the PDF files below and can be downloaded to a computer, flash drive or opened and read online here.

Would you like to be notified when new forum topics or posts are made?
Who Defines the Normal and Why?
The Focus on this interactive page is going to be on the perspective we don't hear much about: the Normal group member and his or her role in the design and diagnosis of the assigned illness, given to the individual who gets psychiatrized, often for 'complaining' about his/her experience with 'others' as well as the Normal's function as a part of a Normal group.

Here we will shift the focus OFF of the psychiatrized one and ONTO the group as a whole, and some of its other members in particular.


I believe we need to take another look at 'Normal' and how it all got to be considered to BE 'Normal. In doing so we may just find that a whole lot of what is now considered to be 'Normal' might better be described as 'common' or ‘habit.' Longstanding dysfunctional relating for example is very often called “Normal' by those who are used to it, who want to stay 'popular' in their group by keeping silent, or who “don't want to make waves “in the name of “getting along.” Often of course, those who are “getting along” are not really “getting along” with everyone and are part of a well practised scapegoating system. 

So if you have some stories of your “Normal' experiences, this is the page for that.


As usual on these pages, please follow the few simple rules of communication and talk about; ideas or experiences generally, your own personal experiences without naming proper names, your feelings, your experiences  of the mental illness system, good or bad, in relation to your own personal experience with it.  Keep it connected on this page though to defining and questioning what is considered to be “Normal” thinking and behaviour. Do NOT name names, as this is a public board and liability laws apply. Keeping your sharing in the first person singular and/or in relation to ideas or concepts allows you to have your say and keeps you and me, safe from harm or legal problems at the same time.


Above is the PDF Copy of the practical use of the Bulletin Board and how the software at this site works for you personally. 

To use this Board you DO have to register to this site in just the same way you do in any support group BUT this discussion is not closed to the public.