Thinking Outside the

Psych Box

The Meta Issue 

Power, Control and Domination over Others,  as opposed to,

Self contained, Self actualization with Boundaries 

The world generally loves the power rush of the first without considering that what goes up too high must always come back down.


Philosophical Question for You
What if on a certain plane of human consciousness thought and communication actually existed on a universal and timeless level? How would that change our understanding of ourselves and of our overall existence?


Your Emotions Are Not Diseases
 They do not need to be eradicated. They are more like the brain’s OnStar system, used as guides to help you navigate your way through life. They signal you that something may be amiss and that there may be a better alternate route to take on your journey. It is up to you though, to LOOK at the map of your personal terrain and decide what may work better than the route you are currently following, in a way that will keep you from crashing and also avoid hitting anyone else along the way.


In Scandinavian research, ... mobbing is seen as an extreme social phenomenon, triggered by extreme social stressors, causing a range of negative effects, such as biological and psychic stress reactions.

Heinz Leymann

The Mobbing Encylopaedia




This is One of My Favourite Videos Recently

Take the time to Listen. It is about 45 minutes and expresses the long overdue need for great change in the awareness of those assessing and evaluating everyone elses.

Great job Prof. Mary Boyle, Glasgow

Power or Powerlessness

If you believe that this is the "choice" you must make in life, in relation to others, then you are thinking like a dysfunctional splitter.

What that is actually offering you is a choice between two dysfunctional poles. In a functioning reality of egalitarians, the choice you must make is between the powerful/powerless paradigm, the "them and us" bit, OR personal empowerment with good boundaries. Healthy life is not a choice between being powerful OR powerless, between being an aggressor or a victim, controlling others or being controlled BY others. It is about being NEITHER a willing, hopeless victim, NOR a self serving aggressor but about achieving Self control as best one can. That is what we must all focus on achieving.

I am not interested in either controlling others nor being controlled BY others and if I am not breaking any laws this should not be a problem for anyone and there should be no reason to pick me up for "treatment" for "thinking" I have been harmed by others. Self control is my thing and all that implies and that has not always been easy. I control me and you control you. If we both operate within personal boundaries, we don't HAVE a problem. That only happens when one or both of us decide the "other" needs to be controlled. With dysfunctional splitters 1+1=3, not 2 because 2 represents two sides of the same experience added together as equal parts. It must be 3 for them, because 3 represents the alternate reality they have created to preserve their beliefs and avoid self awareness. It is the reality they MUST push their "inferiors" INTO in order to maintain their own fantasy world, inside of which all are blameless and "normal" as defined by dysfunctional group consensus.

It's a Two Fold Problem Folks

First the authoritarians in charge think that it is OK to dictate such rules to those they control and which many of those being dictated TO consider to be an obvious abuse of power.

Secondly, that MOST people who tend to follow authority, without question, don't see ANYTHING wrong with that. The Splitter mentality causes that in this way: It's understood to be OK to do that to "them" because "they" are not LIKE "us", who being so different, should not be treated in the same way.

What I want to do, and will CONTINUE to try to do, is create an understanding of the Splitter psychology that can be understood on a global generic level, so that no one will have to be told, or to accept, that we must all "let it go" or "overlook" it, or to stop being "too sensitive." I prefer to look RIGHT AT IT, examine it like it was under a microscope, dissect all it's parts, and make IT so very uncomfortable with all the "attention" it is being given for its performance, that IT shrivels up and disappears completely.


I Got Better Campaign-
REAL Hope  from the Psychiatric
Survivours Movement

What the Bleep Do We Know?

Another Perspective on Experience
Recommended for Psychiatrists and Psychiatrized
( as long as you are staying connected) . ..Alike
Should Quantum Physicists be 'helped'?

Logic Exercise
There are many platitudes and aphorisms used by humans as conversation or debate stoppers. This is one of my favourites of the idiotic concepts ideas.


"That is just the exception which proves the rule."


Dissect this statement in logical terms and explain how it is used as part of the splitting and defence group phenomenon of dysfunctional relating.

Everyone Was Just Shocked
Do you know why you are always “shocked” when a smiling, friendly, socialising type person in a position of authority turns out to be a serial killer? It is because you live in the same fantasy world that the killer promotes to hide himself. He is hiding behind the same mask; smiling, friendly, socialising authority who expects everything he says and does to be accepted without question. Any problem is thought to be in those who question him, and not in him, and/or in those who support and obey him. He is often the one he says ‘there is no ‘I’ in team’ because HE is the ‘I’ who is controlling the team.  

Question your assumptions and beliefs! 



To Comply, or Not to Comply? 

And is There Really a 'Choice'? 

This is called the practice of free speech which I am using here and which my democratic country claims to cherish and protect as a 'right.'

The system likes to pay compliant consumers who will promote the system at the same time that it invalidates and silences those who speak out against it. It is not at all uncommon that threats of further 'treatment' are used to silence the opposing viewpoint.

Have you ever noticed a common denominator in those who promote the system? Listen carefully to their personal stories and you will hear it, again and again.  By common denominator of course I mean other than the fact that they are often well known as writers, politicians, actors, sports figures, singers and other public faces.

Let's think about that for a bit shall we?

As one of my old elementary school teachers used to say, (while using “hand actions”) “Let's pull on our thinking caps!”