By Patricia Lefave, Monophrenic Out of Your Minds...
can you HEAR
that in more than one way?
The world is full of nexus language and what that is, is any
abstraction that is used without connection to concrete specific detail which is what gives it concrete MEANING
. This kind of non
communication is especially difficult to hear when it is used in absolute terms in an attempt to invalidate an individual's perspective on his or her own experience by projecting someone else's meaning into
it as the means of invalidating the individual's perspective on his or her own experience. The "No One Can Be Blamed" people do this often as the means of making sure THEY
don't get held accountable for their own behaviour. Like gang members they seek seek justification in numbers; sanity and "normal" being routinely identified in this world by group consensus. If you deal with someone who leads you to believe you are having an experience based on the SAME
premise and then that person "covertly" splits off and suggests to others, unknown to you, that an opposite
experience is actually what is happening, it is like splitting one dimension into two dimensions and the farther away you get from the event horizon, the more bizarre and surreal it will become, and the less "sense" you will be able to make of it based on your own
So if the "division" of information is between a large group and one person upon whom the large group has been told to focus as the "sick" one, which side do you think will look "crazy"?
When this kind of non reasoning is used in absolute terms it creates a closed system from which there is no escape possible for as long as you continue to see it from INSIDE
. So ironically in order to deal with it as the victim
of it, you can only make a choice between two metaphysical "solutions" and they are:
Accepting a fate from which you cannot escape while trying to bond with your captors so you won't suffer so much or be alone, helpless and hopeless. Then they can call you crazy for seeing them as they actually are
, which they have told you you must deny
in order to avoid being forced into total isolation...
Accept your fate and allow yourself to be pushed out
of the group and into an alternate reality where you WILL
be alone as well because you refuse
to give up and pretend that you don't know them for who they are. They will then call you "crazy" for refusing to go along with the consensus reality they have defined for
Though the second choice seems more frightening, it is still the better choice to me. Why?
Because with the first choice there is no hope for me or anyone else since I am going along
with the group insanity. With the second choice, it may never
change but at least the possibility
of change is there for BOTH
me and everyone else caught up in this dysfunctional crap. From outside the snare I can at least try to show
them the structure and also let them know there IS
something outside it and that I am standing OUTSIDE
So for this example let me point out something to you out of your own training in psychiatry that you can't hear. Maybe if you can learn to hear this, you can learn to hear more than this, and that gives me hope that if I beat my head against the proverbial psychiatric wall long enough, I may wear down your
resistance to the truth you don't like, and don't want to know. You may have to face the reality of yourselves despite your massive efforts to resist it.
Back to Gordon Warme and his own statement:"Psychiatrists, when they are thinking like psychiatrists, never take words at face value."
Got that OK?
So that means then that when psychiatrists "think like psychiatrists" they look for hidden meaning in everything we say.
A psychiatrist told me that if "you find yourself looking for hidden meaning, it is a sign that you need an anti-psychotic."
So looking for hidden meaning then is a sign of insanity is that right?
If this is accepted as true (and if you are psychiatrized then whatever you do don't see the humour in that and "laugh for no reason") then this means one of three things and logically they are:
One: Both the psychiatrists and I are crazy the same way according to psychiatry's reasoning.
Two: There is a splitting of reality taking place in order to accommodate a 'them and us' scenario in which the SAME
thoughts and behaviours are being giving opposing meanings.
Three: Neither I, nor the psychiatrists, are actually crazy and the whole paradigm is just an abstract contrived crock of politicized shit.
Which one do you think it is then?
Comments? Corrections for the whack job here?
Something has been produced from your minds OR you are all crazy.
Yes folks there really IS such thing as a "victim" despite all your irrational denials used to make you keep yourselves feeling "safe." But that is an illusion and might be called a group
delusion if 'reality' was NOT defined by consensus.
In my psychotic imagery this dysfunctional paradigm was called "the loop of destruction"