Truth To Power/Questioning Authority
 

True Intimacy

No one can have an intimate relationship of ANY kind, physical or non physical, with another individual who perceives him or her self as inherently superior and therefore entitled to impose his or her own will and definitions of reality on the other. Intimacy requires equality as the premise of it's being. Without it; intimacy cannot exist.

 

 

Medicalizing Real Illnesses 

Experts have announced that the medicalizing of diabetes has been deemed to be a great success. 

Does that sound absurd to you?

Same here.

Would this kind of reasoning be that known as doublethink if found in an old sci-fi novel?


 

 

There is No Absolute Truth in Abstract Concepts

 Apart from Concrete Details

There is no such thing as defining the life and experiences of individuals in terms of abstract truth in absolute terms. The attempt to do so, as has been done by psychiatry with the DSM, in all its pretensions, is insanity itself. You just keep making it worse and worse, by adding more and more, to the damage already done, with the invention of ever more imaginary diseases.

 

Infinite Tautologies

Sitting in a psychiatrist's office and being labelled as crazy with no prospect of recovery, after 11 minutes have passed since I first said, “how do you do?” is not considered to be an action that is “harmful” to me, by the doctor who labels me that way, which he does BECAUSE I “think” I have been harmed by others, in particular, in my own case, by “others” who are all part of the mental illness system itself!

“Crazy” does not get any crazier than that. Had I laughed out loud at that point I may have had a slightly different label bestowed upon me but the absurdity of it would still be pretty much the same. The feeling of “invisibility” which overcomes many of us in this situation is generated by the system itself. You MUST change this.

I once told my recovery therapist that I had long viewed the whole planet as one big insane asylum. You don't get FULL
I once told my recovery therapist that I had long viewed the whole planet as one big insane asylum. You don't get FULL "Privileges" until after you are "released" for good....

Definitions  Updated

What psychiatrists need to define, contain and control the most is psychiatry's ever expanding need to define, contain and control everything and everyone!

Forensics Cops and Psychiatrists

Just as evidence without context is all but meaningless (cops)

So is Context (or theory) without evidence. (psychiatrists, DSM writers)  

In BOTH cases, theory (abstraction) and evidence (concrete proof) must go TOGETHER. Let's sing it now....cause you can't have one without the o...o..other!

Which "Power" Really Does not Like, ...
...and does not really want to hear. So "Power" has instructed Me (in "private" of Course,) to keep my truth to myself, or Power "could"  overpower Me....

No One REALLY
No One REALLY "Hides" in Plain Sight
    
Yes definitely..but still not as much as Psychiatry fears the Idea

The REAL "Problem" People

By Patricia Lefave, Labeled, D.D.(P) in 11 cost effective minutes, for Seeing IT...

The real problem people aren't "just seeking attention" by "claiming" they've "been harmed by others."

The REAL problem people are harming others, often really ENJOYING it, and usually engaged in "covert" ops, disinformation and misdirection- to AVOID having any attention focused on THEM and what they, in fact, DO. You know?...behaving like CSIS or CIA agents. From where did you think their targets' analogies CAME? From just out of the air, or out of a state of meaninglessness in our chemically imbalanced brains?

Do you still think the est-ee and his supporters DON'T KNOW they are lying and hiding the truth about what they did? Are they "just following orders"? Do you think that I DON'TKNOW that? You miss the point in this and quite consistently too.

In this very common experience of relating, BOTH perpetrator and victim already know the truth that exists BETWEEN them. So do the supporters to some extent though not as well or as fully as victim and perpetrator. The point is that you, who are assessing and evaluating the situation between the original pair in the power struggle never REALLY get it because there is too much information/disinformation to sort out and so much missing, added or "spun." For many perps this is a planned, scripted, and mostly predictable EFFECT on groups of manipulated people.

When you who have supported the est-ee, "side" of the situation, in my case, SAID, in his presence, "It doesn't make any sense at all..." (which MOST of you used to "assess" ME), what do you think the est-ee HEARD in his head, as he SMILED to himself? Let me help by explaining some of his programming to you.

"It" is est, and what HE got is that "sense" (logic) is a LOWER level of consciousness, that "It works". Because non-estians, such as myself, and also all of you, are not 'enlightened", like HE is, and so "we" don't know that "life is meaningless", like he does. Therefore "'we" have to look for the hidden meaning, the meaning he has in fact, "hidden" and also we have to look for the "reason" in things. Since we unenlightened ones all DO that, he can use our "ignorance"' to help him achieve power, control and domination, which s what est states it is about, with NOCONCRETE evidence of the intent to do so.

Of course, once the socially sanctioned target has been selected for "experiencing out of his circle" it is very common for an expanded group of largely amateur (by comparison) ass-holes to join in the "fun;" some even stating, "we all got caught right up in it" , and these ones increase the "story telling" and "testing" of the target, for the entertainment of it. The "entertainment of it" is used as the motivation for their participation. In fact, in my own fascinating "case," that was acted out for me as well on the streets, as the reality, in relation to the then, H2 and H3 staff involved. Now note that from MY perspective, most of my information about what was going on there is third party rumour spreading which is not considered to be valid in a court of law as it is classified as "hearsay." However psychiatry generally does not concern itself with concrete evidence, as the DSM itself shows us. So legal rights don't have the same meaning in this particular scenario, which is loaded to the gills with abstract ideas, apart from concrete details.

 
 
(people hear, they say and as we all know what they hear and say is often full of "disinformation" and "interpretation.")

Many who join in these kind of group-think events also tend to enjoy getting a distress reaction from the targets. These reactions are also enjoyed by a variety of other every day ass-holes, on a sliding scale from that of mass murdering psychopathic dictators, looking for domination power and control, to the less extreme and yet still similar, school bully. In all cases, the "play" (structure and abusive "fun") remain the same.

That structure is also the s tructure of est, as an abstraction, apart from concrete details. The HEARERS of It, supply It with their OWN details, in "whatever way seems good or useful to YOU. "It," being true to it's OWN nature, is ALSO not defined, specifically, as an abstraction. How it that? Well what do the SAME WORDS mean to you, even as an abstraction? Are they intended to be hear as, an accusation, a revelation or an instruction...to YOU? What is IT, TOYOU?

Answer: "Reality is all a matter of perspective."

This est saying was often repeated in the early seventies. So since it is meaningless, you can use It, however you like. "Take what YOU get," as they say in the training.

Whatever YOU get, whatever concrete details YOU add to IT, Werner/Jack can't be held responsible for that since as he says, he NEVER tells anyone WHAT to think. What you "choose" to do with It is your own choice and from your own "interpretation" and the one who "gets It" and uses It, in whatever way seems useful TO HIM/Her, is "totally responsible" for everything that happens to him, as a result of that.

From Werner/Jacks' perspective, it's MEANINGLESS.

As he says, only the one who starts the action, The Source, is "at cause" and in his mind, everything and everyone that comes after that is "effect, effect, effect...(at effect) of course at the NEXUS of meaning, (some call it the nexus of good and evil) cause and effect are meaningless, as at the nexus, he is both and therefore also neither. Only those beneath him on the Scale of Knowing, are one OR the other.

In Reality ("out here")

In reality, this could be the antithesis of "enlightenment."designed as a metaphysical structure to obfuscate any clarifying details...but then DOING just that and demonstrating HOW to do it, IS a FORM of enlightenment for SOME isn't it?

It "works" for as long as it is kept secret, at least in part. After all nothing makes sense (har har...positive AND negative in relation to est.....yuk yuk...) if you don't have enough information, or even if you have too much attached to a false premise.......(snicker Snicker) and may work especially well if those, who are "not like us" can't ever "get" the complete picture. What THAT does is create a state of uncertainty...is Schrodinger's cat alive or dead inside that box?

Well if I am the one who PUT a DEAD cat inside that box when there were no witnesses to my action, then I am the only one who really knows the state of Schrodinger's cat. Of course that doesn't really make me superior to those who don't know.. it may just make me a cat killer, who likes to delude myself that I am "superior' to those who don;t know the cat is already dead, that I killed it and that I am lying about it all while smiling at them and acting all high minded and brainy about it.

Getting Out of It

"Life's a joke; it's a game of winners and losers."

In THIS game, the "joke" is your BELIEF that life is a joke; a game of winners and losers. The joke's on you and you are playing It on yourself but you are too lacking in self awareness to get the REAL joke. Real life is a collective experience of equal souls (physical and metaphysical) in ONE interconnected spirit of being.

Cause AND Effect- not "OR."

If the cause (premise) is a good sound egalitarian one, so will the effect be as well. It's the premise that matters. It is the premise that determines outcomes. So while it true that the premise and the goal rest on the same point and can be "set first," it is also true that when you have a faulty premise, the whole structure will ultimately collapse.

So if you, who have assessed and evaluated me, for more than two decades, much of it "covertly," would REALLY like to know what YOUR role is in this, rather than just taking care of your own interests, apart from the interests of your "subjects," as you believe that to be, read the infinite abstractions which are the generic structure of this training, which is kept "secret" from non-estians (outsiders) because missing information makes resolution very difficult indeed, if not impossible. Then, using my "fascinating case" as the genetic defective and as connected TO the concrete details in THIS version of it, stop "hiding" and identify the role YOU played in making IT "work," for the one who is "at cause" and The Source of his own pain. Perhaps this is why the followers don't have to call the Leader, "the Source" anymore? Can it be because he followed the Leader who convinced him that if he was a member of THIS group, he would be a superior human being to all those who just don't get It.

This is IT: the generic version of "The Game" of power, control and domination.

Does it sound familiar at all? It should. This "game" is a very old game of destruction disguised as "salvation."

(or enlightenment, or sometimes "education" or maybe 'transcendence..... you get the idea...or DO YOU? )

Try reading this one below too and then see if you can figure out why the title by Pressman.

 
 

Comments

Please install Flash® and turn on Javascript.

Use of Language

One of the things that the late activist, Judi Chamberlin and I were in agreement on was the idea of taking the languageaway from our controllers/abusers. It is something that comedians use as a tool as well since doing so takes the power away from those who use the language to reduce us to “less than” so that they can delude themselves that they are “more than” and therefore entitled to control us.

That being stated then,' How are all you psychiatrists enjoying my writing behaviours?”

Comedian

I was so depressed when my marriage broke up that instead of taking an anti depressant as suggested by my doctor, I got a dog instead and named him Paxil. 

I am doing all right now, thanks to Paxil.

You are not really objective observers of inherently defective human beings. That's a delusion.

You are DEFECTIVE observers of equal human beings in distress, caused by events, traumas relationships, drug and alcohol problems, or beliefs and often a combination of some of those things.  To “treat” people like self-contained “disease processes” without relationship to external reality and other people is probably the MOST damaging, isolating thing you could do. So I will ask you from here, so that you can hide and feel safe; WHY are you doing this to “us”?

Collective Pretensions

If you are worrying about how you look and sound to others, as compared to how you actually are, does that not mean that at some level of your being you actually KNOW that you are splitting and operating from behind a facade? Do you think other people don't know that or are you just counting on them joining you in the Pretence so that they too can be popular, like you, for co-operating with the currently promoted, splitting agenda and calling it “normal?”

Guess this is maybe why you folks have turned words like “compliance” into “good” character traits huh? Why....if even YOU high minded folks diagnosing the world are doing it, it MUST be right and normal! 

Seeing Things
Seeing Things
Does This Sound Familiar to Most of You?
 
Now do you think that is because all of us who say this sort of thing are just out of touch with reality or is it because we are IN touch with it and some
other people are having trouble accepting things at face value?

It's Nameless 

We live in a schizophrenic SOCIETY which has a grocery store brand called “No Name” which is meant to indicate that this is not a brand name and, which is registered AS a brand name, so that “no name” cannot be used by anyone else who wants to claim their generic, non branded product has “no name!”

000310227