Signs and Symbols of Madness Everywhere

Which are Routinely “Overlooked”

Do you ever wonder why interventions are NOT performed on “As Yet To Be Labelled” individuals who seem to think and talk so much like we officially labelled Loons?  Well, me too. Let's all take a closer look here shall we? Conversely, Do Labeled People ever get Better?

Veteran's Helping Veterans  TV org

Call Me Crazy 

Has been reproduced here with the full Knowledge and permission of Paula J. Caplan, PhD., Now at Harvard

Free Handout for Reprogramming Awareness
Free Handout- Print at Will

Never Ending Pressure

Which Often is INCREASED if You Disagree with Your Diagnostician?

The hardest thing in my experience with covert controllers, with psychiatry and all the unquestioning supporters and enablers of them all, has been trying to find the WORDS to describe the whole experience which will make it understandable to everyone else. It is like trying to explain the perfectly obvious, over and over again, to people who can't hear a word I say as "real."

It is like beating a dead horse. I must hope that if I beat this horse LONG enough, the pain from the whipping will cause it to jump up and live again if only out of self defence. It seems quite pointless but I have no other options except to give up completely and I just can't DO that because though I could saunter off and head off myself soon, for that big pasture in the sky, (or perhaps to another dimension parallel to THIS one) this system is going to keep right on doing, what it is doing, while remaining blind to the obvious horror of it and the devastating results that go with it.

They are now starting to pump psychiatric drugs into BABIES, for God's sake and it has even been discussed as to how feasible it would be to get it done before the poor innocent children emerge from the womb. Signs and symbols of insanity in babies!!

Let me give you a concrete example, in nice simple terms, to show you how this FEELS, sounds and looks, to those of us who cannot get heard.

It is like being asked what you had for lunch today.

You answer: I had a bowl of turkey soup.

Your assessor frowns and says, No you didn't.

"What," you say, confused by the weird response.

I know that you did not have a bowl of turkey soup for lunch.

Why are you saying that? you ask.

You did not expect me to do that did you? states your analyzer.

No, you say, honestly but naively, I didn't.

Your assessor thinks he's got you now as s/he has made you "admit" that you did not expect you assessor to say that...Aha! Sigmund is in the building.

Keep in mind now that you KNOW, for a fact, that you had turkey soup for lunch. That being the case, you will now have to wonder what logic Sigmund is using or what it , exactly, that he is trying to do...and if you ASK him, you won't get a straight answer. It does not get any better, or any clearer, from here either as Sigmund, who is never wrong about anything, in his own opinion, is out to prove that he knows more about you than you do, AND is determined, one way or the other, to get you to "admit" that you really had a cheese sandwich for lunch and that YOU, you defective you, were only claiming that you had a bowl of turkey soup in your pathetic attempt to "outsmart" him.

So, does the situation you are in "confuse" you? In any dysfunctional group, it takes only ONE PERSON to turn your life upside down and backwards if they create an "alternate reality" which everyone else who gets involved, either by plan or by accident, ACCEPTS as unquestioned truth because it would "make no sense" for the one who created it to say such a thing if there was "no reason" for him, or her, to do so. This is about reality defined by GROUP CONSENSUS and backed by "authority."

So Sigmund tells you, Well you will not succeed in your treachery you luncheon liar you! For Sigmund, an expert in these matters, who never accepts ANYTHING the one being assessed says, at face value. He also trains others to see and hear, signs and symbols of madness EVERYWHERE- except of course, in Sigmund and all his loyal followers...which goes without saying of course.

You will then be pressured by the whole group, sometimes now known as an A.C.T. Team involving the public, to DENY your own reality and to agree to accept the alternate one, which has been created FOR you by others.[1] I would suggest that you do not show any fear, anger, frustration or resentment as these are now all to be considered to be "inappropriate affects," not legitimate feelings, and will be subject to "treatment."

You are about to be diagnosed with LLD-Luncheon Liar Disorder, which of course is caused by a chemical imbalance in your brain which only the truly wise can spot and diagnose...well...until Sigmund tells the new nurse being hired for the job to save even more money, how to spot and diagnose it, so the nursing community can officially take over the control of your mind and life for you.

After all, as we all know, there is no subset of humanity more highly integrated than nurses, as a collective abstract identity, in absolute terms. If you have any doubts about that, just listen to them at their own lunch table discussing and evaluating their fellow employees; mostly "covertly" of course.

Bones- "Message" off the T.V. Just for Psychiatrists

A woman FBI agent who had met the forensics psychiatrist on the job pointed out the beliefs of Sigmund Freud as part of her profiling of a case. The forensics psych pointed out in return that Freud is now largely discredited for his work and beliefs and is known to have been a cocaine addict as well.

That's now.

Then though, he was regarded as a great genius and was slavishly followed as an expert whom his followers had to please. What did the people defined as the mental patients, over whom he had power and control, think of him? Do you think it mattered to either him or his followers back then?

Like for example, young women who told Freud that they had been sexually abused as children by adult males, sometimes their own fathers, to which Freud is known to have responded, often while screaming at them from his position of power, "that did not happen! That is only what you wanted to happen!"

The women sometimes responded to this accusation, this reality reversal, with great emotion hollering "no..no...don't say such a thing!"

Let's just think about that for a minute from right here, in 2013 shall we?

Isn't it fascinating how we are now "allowed" to discredit those we formerly admired and followed without question but ONLY long after they are dead and can no longer affect us in our current life? After all we don't want to be blaming any experts while they are still alive now, do we? Besides, those "sick" women from back then are also dead, many of them dying in asylums, where they were locked up and tortured (as defined by the U.N.) for telling those 'stories" of abuse by the fine,upstanding citizens of their day. So now, if we "admit" to anything, they can no longer threaten our image with any law suits, right? It is always how it all looks and sounds that really matters isn't it?

What I would like you to think about NOW, in 2013, is how those women felt then,knowing what they did, and also knowing that no matter what they said and partly because of what they said, the truth they were telling, there was NO WAY OUT and they were trapped forever by a system that was defining their reality FOR them, while denying that life is, what it is. FEEL THAT! Drop the "medication" long enough to feel reality for a change.

Mediate on it and then let us all know how you will justify it. Don't forget to lean heavily on the idea that, "It was a long time ago. We must let it go."

Just hum loudly until I give up trying to get you to hear it.

[1] Repeat after me...I had a cheese sandwich for lunch. I did not have a bowl of turkey soup and be sure to sound like you believe it when you say it. Admit to the doctor that you can sure see the error of your ways now and don't forget to say thank you.


Cheryl Michaels 3/1/2013
When a doctor's practice is based on ignoring the subjective experience of the patient it is malpractice -- the SOP of psychiatrists. Involuntary treatment is malpractice. It does not promote health; it promotes trauma and early death. Once you're on the involuntary list they don't care. The culture, the schools, discount the mind and personality of the individual in favor of a clumsy drug that acts like a blunt instrument. How could this possibly lead to mental health. It's ridiculous. Criminals have more rights, and their sentences come to an end. Brutal!

Riddle: what's the difference between being in ANY kind of a relationship with someone and being in any kind of a relationship ABOUT someone?

Answer: in the first case you are actually in a relationship and in the second case, you aren't.

To Homewood Staff, Psych Students and ALL of Those Who Follow Wherever They are Led, Without Question
Unlike Myself, Most of You are Very Normal

by Patricia Lefave, Monophrenic

One of my readers was telling me that he had been contacted by a professional to participate in a conference about the 'stigma' of mental illness. My reader then discovered that the professional was not really interested in hearing what was being said, just as inside the bio psychiatric system he had not seen any interest in his point of view after the first few minutes when a diagnosis was reached. In part, my answer to his experience included this and I thought I would post it here as I have heard it so frequently.

What 'stigma' means to 'them' and what it means to us is not the same thing. "They" want to get rid of the ''stigma" of 'mental illness' by training the public to become even MORE deaf to what we 'claim' happened to us involving other people, by strenuously promoting the idea that our CLAIMS are just a manifestation of a bio chemical illness 'just like diabetes.'

See the difference? We on
BOTH sides of the meaning admit to the ongoing existence of a 'stigma,' but the understanding of the actual cause of that is completely different. So, while we are using the same WORD, we do not mean the same thing, and 'OUR' side of our own experience is not invited to 'debate' it with the 'experts.' This extreme imbalance (ironically) of POWER and control is what is keeping this going.

It creates a tautological argument that has already been 'won' by the 'experts'
BEFORE our experience of it has even begun. It is also doing a damned fine job of enabling and supporting abusers who want to believe THEY represent all this is 'normal' in the world and they are therefore 'justified' in their abuse of others since we 'others' are 'abnormal.' This is especially true if the abuse is psycho-spiritual/verbal in nature as we can’t parade our 'bruises' or 'injury' in a concrete way.

 It is all about the psycho-politics.