November 14th 2013

Involved in the production, selling and purchasing of child porn, which means the planned and executed sexual abuse of children were:

Doctors, nurses, lawyers, cops, priests and teachers...”authority figures” whom children and many others are not “allowed” to question challenge for their behaviour or blame.

I am sure many of them are smiling, soft spoken, polite pillars, polite of the community whose friends and neighbours are, or will be, just shocked. And it appears that it is Canadians pillars leading the abuse.

Do you suppose that many of these people are actually parents themselves?

Do you know what fuels this ongoing abuse of children? Alcohol, drugs, authoritarian power and control, with the “rush” that brings to the controller, sexuality without any boundaries, or any sense of privacy and respect, and of course, the all time favourite- PROFIT.

Here is the link-Don't forget to drop your jaws

I want you to think about something else alongside this case. Had the police not interrupted this and managed to rescue these children, and many children all over the world do NOT get rescued, I think it likely that many of these victims, who did not commit suicide, would very likely have ended up in the mental illness system, not believed about what they had been put through, and many of them would have received a nice psychiatric containment label, invalidating them for their “attention seeking stories” since no one believes that the pillars of the community, or anyone’s parents, would ever harm children. Yet this is reality isn't it? The FIRST thing the scum of the earth do, including the scum in the expensive suits, is REDUCE the targets of their abuse to the level of item, object, or commodity, since doing so makes the abuse, or use, of them acceptable to the scum of the earth.

The labels reducing the patient to a self contained “disease” process do not solve real life problems with real people in the real world. In fact, they often re-traumatize the victims of abuse all over again and keep them trapped in a position of permanent invalidation and often increased abuse BECAUSE of the reductionism.

Breaking Bad

How do you think I mean that?

Do I mean that someone who breaks away from the norm is breaking bad, OR

Do I mean that we human beings who want to live a decent life and make it possible for others to do the same need to break BAD; bad itself. All things mean what they mean in context. If you believe that you can identify ANY subset of humanity as the good group or the bad group based on concrete details like job title, for example, you are delusional yourself.

Do you really want to break the power of aggressors operating with hidden agendas of domination and control? If you do, talk CONSTANTLY about the hidden agendas of power and control and the people using them and do it with the SAME attitude of observation and clinical detachment which you currently use in observing and assessing the victims who complain about them.

Believe me...if you invalidate the crap out of them, while observing and assessing THEM like objects of observation, often enough, for long enough, they will give up their “game.”

In other words, use your metaphysical power in a way, on whom, and where it will do some genuine good, which is not about suppressing the feelings of the victims of abuse nor making abusers FEEL better about it when, or IF they get caught.